<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Digital Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepopview.com/wordpress/2006/06/02/on-digital-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepopview.com/wordpress/2006/06/02/on-digital-music/</link>
	<description>Pop culture and nothing but.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 03:07:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jb</title>
		<link>http://www.thepopview.com/wordpress/2006/06/02/on-digital-music/comment-page-1/#comment-4322</link>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepopview.com/wordpress/?p=360#comment-4322</guid>
		<description>yeah it&#039;s weird. i was sorting through my genres in itunes and i thought they&#039;d be pretty evenly distributed. incorrect. a lot more hip hop than i imagined.  i think this also has to do with the fact that high school is when i amassed most of my cd collection (since transferred to the pod) and i was really into hip hop then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah it&#8217;s weird. i was sorting through my genres in itunes and i thought they&#8217;d be pretty evenly distributed. incorrect. a lot more hip hop than i imagined.  i think this also has to do with the fact that high school is when i amassed most of my cd collection (since transferred to the pod) and i was really into hip hop then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pop View</title>
		<link>http://www.thepopview.com/wordpress/2006/06/02/on-digital-music/comment-page-1/#comment-3479</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pop View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepopview.com/wordpress/?p=360#comment-3479</guid>
		<description>However, Kevin Drum had &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2006_05/008899.php&quot;&gt;this reaction to the Slate piece&lt;/a&gt;:



&lt;blockquote&gt;Everyone&#039;s pissed off over Jacob Weisberg&#039;s weird rant about Hillary Clinton&#039;s iPod, and they&#039;re right to be. He basically used it as an excuse to demonstrate that Hillary is exactly the conniving fake he always thought she was, and it&#039;s likely he would have written the exact same thing regardless of what songs had made her top ten list. It was a remarkably lazy piece.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, Kevin Drum had <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2006_05/008899.php">this reaction to the Slate piece</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Everyone&#8217;s pissed off over Jacob Weisberg&#8217;s weird rant about Hillary Clinton&#8217;s iPod, and they&#8217;re right to be. He basically used it as an excuse to demonstrate that Hillary is exactly the conniving fake he always thought she was, and it&#8217;s likely he would have written the exact same thing regardless of what songs had made her top ten list. It was a remarkably lazy piece.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.thepopview.com/wordpress/2006/06/02/on-digital-music/comment-page-1/#comment-3477</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepopview.com/wordpress/?p=360#comment-3477</guid>
		<description>Slate had a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2142359/?nav=tap3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;great piece&lt;/a&gt; on political playlists. 

This was my favorite bit:

&quot;Hillary Clinton is the least spontaneous of politicians, and this playlist suggests premeditation, if not actual poll-testing. She first indicates that she basically likes everything before coming to roost on classic rock and soul, which any baby boomer must identify with, lest she or he be branded terminally uncool. Hillary avoids, however, anything too racy, druggie, or aggressive, while naming tunes that are empowering and inspirational. On the world-is-divided-into-two-kinds-of-people question &quot;the Beatles or the Stones,&quot; she, like her husband, finds a middle path: both. She names no Stones songs and chooses a consensus, universally liked, neither-early-nor-late Beatles tune, &quot;Hey Jude.&quot; Hillary also manages a shout-out to racial diversity and feminism via Aretha Franklin, and she strikes a younger, socially conscious chord with U2. &quot;Take It to the Limit,&quot; on the other hand, is such a lame, black-hole-of-the-1970s choice that it can&#039;t be taken for anything other than an expression of actual taste.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slate had a <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2142359/?nav=tap3" rel="nofollow">great piece</a> on political playlists. </p>
<p>This was my favorite bit:</p>
<p>&#8220;Hillary Clinton is the least spontaneous of politicians, and this playlist suggests premeditation, if not actual poll-testing. She first indicates that she basically likes everything before coming to roost on classic rock and soul, which any baby boomer must identify with, lest she or he be branded terminally uncool. Hillary avoids, however, anything too racy, druggie, or aggressive, while naming tunes that are empowering and inspirational. On the world-is-divided-into-two-kinds-of-people question &#8220;the Beatles or the Stones,&#8221; she, like her husband, finds a middle path: both. She names no Stones songs and chooses a consensus, universally liked, neither-early-nor-late Beatles tune, &#8220;Hey Jude.&#8221; Hillary also manages a shout-out to racial diversity and feminism via Aretha Franklin, and she strikes a younger, socially conscious chord with U2. &#8220;Take It to the Limit,&#8221; on the other hand, is such a lame, black-hole-of-the-1970s choice that it can&#8217;t be taken for anything other than an expression of actual taste.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

